Let me first say that I do not accept violence in actions. In fact, I’m not alone as neither does the ALF. So, I’m not sure what the false logic of safety has to do with this draconian movement. Literally, they are taking away the rights of people to assemble and speak, based solely on their beliefs.
Second, how will they define “animal rights activist?” Would this include a person who wears a pin on their lapel? Is it the vegetarian? Will they be expelled from school? If someone speaks up for the case of animal rights n the philosophy class will the enforcers come in and throw the person off of the campus? See, this is bigger than they would think. You’d think a school like Oxford would understand the scope of such measures. Unfortunately though, with big money, this is a sign of things to come in the UK and the US.
Article:
University seeks to ban animal rights activists from 'whole of Oxford'
http://www.24dash.com/content/news/
viewNews.php?navID=7&newsID=4685
Publisher: Jon Land
Oxford University today applied to extend the scope of its existing injunction against animal rights activists to cover the whole city.
The hearing before Mr Justice Holland at London's High Court is the latest skirmish in the battle over the new biomedical research laboratory site in South Parks Road.
The current injunction allows a weekly demonstration against the construction of the £20 million project but places a ban on the use of amplified noise or cameras within a designated exclusion zone.
Charles Flint QC said that there was no intention to prevent lawful peaceful protests or the permitted monthly demonstration which was next due on April 22.
But, the proposed extension was necessary to protect persons working at the university and those associated with it from intimidation and harassment.
"The university premises are spread out throughout Oxford and there is no logical line to draw because of the width of the class of persons who are targeted in the defendants' campaign.
"It necessarily follows that it is not possible to identify particular buildings or colleges.
"The whole of the university is the target of this campaign."
He said that the judge would see from video evidence that the defendants had "clearly flouted" orders previously made.
"We also rely very strongly on the fact that the leaders of this campaign have publicly threatened criminal damage and direct action against those associated with the university, so it is in those circumstances in which the university returns to court to protect its staff and students, but also other persons."
Mr Flint said that the existing boundaries meant that protesters could congregate each Thursday immediately outside the Department of Experimental Psychology, which was a particular target.
An order imposed last month prohibited them from using any "megaphone, klaxon, siren, whistle, drum or noise amplification" within the zone and also banned cameras or video cameras.
Despite this, said counsel, witness statements from people in departments all around that area testified to noise during the weekly protests, spread over four hours, and at other times.
The judge referred to the "astonishing " nature of the noise and described it as "typically self-defeating".
One statement from a person who was actually sympathetic to the campaign said that she was finding life "intolerable".
He suggested an amendment allowing for amplified noise to be limited to one hour of the protest, such as lunchtime.
Equally seriously, said Mr Flint, it was possible from the current boundaries for campaigners to observe contractors entering the site.
"It is clear that some of those engaged in this campaign are determined to find out who the contractors are and trace them so they can intimidate these companies into withdrawing."
There was also a short-term problem of the noise affecting the forthcoming examination season.
Marc Willers, counsel for two of the named defendants, said that if the noise was restricted and brought back to an acceptable level, there was no need for an extension.
He said that there had been no arrests at the designated protest site for 18 months, and suggested that it was significant that there was no evidence from the police about the need for any extension.
"What is suggested clearly goes way beyond what is necessary in this case and amounts to an unjustified and disproportionate infringement on the right to protest.
"We say that the respondents should not be prevented from continuing any peaceful procession or assembly within the city of Oxford, providing that it is a lawful exercise of their rights.
"Whenever there is a concern on the part of the police that they are exercising their rights in an unlawful fashion, then there are ample powers available to the police to ensure that public order is maintained."
The individuals covered by the injunction are: Mel Broughton; John Curtin; Robert Cogswell; Max Gastone; Robin Webb; Amanda Richards; Greg Avery and Natasha Avery plus a number of named groups.
The hearing was adjourned until tomorrow.
GEARI (the Group for the Education of Animal - Related Issues) is a non-profit educational group dedicated to assisting you in your search for information on animal rights-related issues, the environment and human health. Your reference source for animal rights information. Visit us at our web site at http://www.geari.org. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, or Syndicate us via RSS.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Search for More Content
Custom Search
Past Articles
-
▼
2006
(726)
-
▼
April
(68)
- Spain's Governing Party Promoting a Controversial ...
- Group In Oregon Wants Schumacher Fur Store To Labe...
- National Animal-Rights Group Urges Counseling For ...
- Judge in NJ Fines Activists Protesting the New Jer...
- Simple Form to Let Representatives Know You Suppor...
- Chicago Bans Sale of Foie Gras in Restaurants: Wh...
- Sickos in Williams Township in NJ Kill Two Baby Go...
- In Effort To Encourage Greater Care Of Companion A...
- Commentary: Protesters Against Animal Experimentat...
- Turkeys at a Farm in the UK Were Thrown In the Air...
- Group Has Filed Notice That it Will Sue The Minnes...
- Last Chance for Animals to Push for Congress to Pa...
- 16 Year Old Girl Posts Video of Herself Abusing Ca...
- Drug Testing Giant Covance Plans to Build Vivisect...
- New Group Seeks Amnesty and Restitution for Chimpa...
- Removed From the Jungle and Smuggled Into Thailand...
- Utah Settles a Lawsuit Filed by Two Animal-Rights ...
- Even in Tasmania, Activists Fight to Expose Cruelt...
- Dog Eating Will Stay Illegal In The Philippines
- Advocates Lobby Against End To Sunday Hunting Ban ...
- Reward Offered For Info In Brutal Dog Abuse Case i...
- Animal Rights Groups Seek Probe Into Lion Cub's De...
- In the Town of Collierville, TN, Puppy Mutilated, ...
- Louisiana's Proposed Pet Evacuation Bill, Passed T...
- Louisiana's Proposed Pet Evacuation Bill - Senate ...
- Bennie Thompson: This Earth Day, Let’s Make Enviro...
- The Sierra Club Creates Contest to Finance a Sport...
- Even Though Chinese Eat Less Civets due to SARS, t...
- When Other Animals Suffer, So Do We: Washington Po...
- Pro-Hunting Japanese Seize Control Of Whaling Comm...
- HSUS Ends it’s Documentation for this Year of the ...
- Another Sell Out: Nestlé Looks Set To Swallow Up ...
- Brutal Canadians Laugh at the Rules and Exceed Kil...
- In Canada, the Harassment Continues: Those who Cam...
- Postal Workers Have Reports Of Baby Chicks Dying I...
- India's Tigers Are Vanishing at an Alarming Rate: ...
- Puppies Being Smuggled Out of Mexico to be Sold At...
- Group Decides To Withdraw Activities In Romania Fo...
- Campaign Against the Cruelty of Kentucky Fried Chi...
- Residents in the Eastern Quebec in Canada Resort t...
- Sickening Videos of Pigs Being Stunned With Taser ...
- How You Can Help Pass The Louisiana Pet Evacuation...
- New Video Game for Play Station Turns Table on Ani...
- Wacko Wacks Out and Eats Puppy
- In Scotland, Dog Pulling as Cruel as Dog Fighting ...
- Brutal Canadians to Begin Second Leg of Baby Seal ...
- Maine Fully Enacts Bill To Allow Judges To Include...
- Kentucky Legislature Votes To Make Illegal The Pra...
- ASPCA Leads in a Lawsuit against Ringling Brothers...
- Oxford University Seeks to Deny Free Speech and Fr...
- Even though Yerkes Cannot Prove that HIV Tests Wou...
- Believe it or Not, Mattel Creates a “Bullfighting ...
- The Kenya Wildlife Service Says it Has Broken Up a...
- Cathy Kangas of PRAI Beauty Offers Canadian Govt. ...
- Citizens of Louisiana Will Have March Declaring Ne...
- After Intimidation and Pressure by Canadian Govern...
- USDA Has Fined Drug-Testing Company Covance, After...
- Animal Rights Groups Honors Police for Saving Moose
- Maine's Governor Signs Bill That Allows Animals To...
- Scientists Cause Additional Suffering to Examine S...
- National Park Service in Point Reyes, California P...
- Humane Society of the United States Denied Permit ...
- Costco Removes Seal Oil Capsules From Their St. Jo...
- Two Hindu Organizations Are Supporting A Hare Kris...
- Somali Animal Rights Community Looks to Save Many ...
- Pictures of Dogs and Cats Who Were Victims of Hurr...
- Canadian Government Attempts to Hide the Brutal Tr...
- Misleading "Animal Care Certified" Logo Found on E...
-
▼
April
(68)
No comments:
Post a Comment