Very disappointing that he actually thought this act would be ok. I hope his power doesn’t let him get away from such a blatant act of animal cruelty.
Article:
Romney's Cruel Canine Vacation
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1638065,00.html
The reporter intended the anecdote that opened part four of the Boston Globe's profile of Mitt Romney to illustrate, as the story said, "emotion-free crisis management": Father deals with minor — but gross — incident during a 1983 family vacation, and saves the day. But the details of the event are more than unseemly — they may, in fact, be illegal.
With the 2008 campaign just months old, the G.O.P. candidate has already made some memorable misstatements
Romney's Disappointing Campaign
Viewpoint: The Republican star acts like a man on a mission, says Joe Klein, but without a shred of courage or conviction
The incident: dog excrement found on the roof and windows of the Romney station wagon. How it got there: Romney strapped a dog carrier — with the family dog Seamus, an Irish Setter, in it — to the roof of the family station wagon for a twelve hour drive from Boston to Ontario, which the family apparently completed, despite Seamus's rather visceral protest.
Massachusetts's animal cruelty laws specifically prohibit anyone from carrying an animal "in or upon a vehicle, or otherwise, in an unnecessarily cruel or inhuman manner or in a way and manner which might endanger the animal carried thereon." An officer for the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals responded to a description of the situation saying "it's definitely something I'd want to check out." The officer, Nadia Branca, declined to give a definitive opinion on whether Romney broke the law but did note that it's against state law to have a dog in an open bed of a pick-up truck, and "if the dog was being carried in a way that endangers it, that would be illegal." And while it appears that the statute of limitations has probably passed, Stacey Wolf, attorney and legislative director for the ASPCA, said "even if it turns out to not be against the law at the time, in the district, we'd hope that people would use common sense...Any manner of transporting a dog that places the animal in serious danger is something that we'd think is inappropriate...I can't speak to the accuracy of the case, but it raises concerns about the judgment used in this particular situation."
Ingrid Newkirk, president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, was less circumspect. PETA does not have a position on Romney's candidacy per se, but Newkirk called the incident "a lesson in cruelty that was ... wrong for [his children] to witness...Thinking of the wind, the weather, the speed, the vulnerability, the isolation on the roof, it is commonsense that any dog who's under extreme stress might show that stress by losing control of his bowels: that alone should have been sufficient indication that the dog was, basically, being tortured." Romney, of course, has expressed support for the use of "enhanced interrogation" techniques when it comes to terrorists; his campaign refused to comment about the treatment of his dog.
As organizer of the Salt Lake City Olympic Games, Romney came under fire from some animal welfare groups for including a rodeo exhibition as part of the Games' festivities. At the time, he told protesters, "We are working hard to make this as safe a rodeo for cowboys and animals as is humanly possible."
Thursday, June 28, 2007
Louisiana Puts Forth Bill that Will Ban Cockfighting: If Governor Signs it, Louisiana will be Last State in United States to Ban Cockfighting
Wow. I never thought I’d see the day. Let’s hope that Blanco signs it. It’s been a long hard road for those against animal cruelty.
For more on why cockfighting is wrong, see -
http://www.hsus.org/hsus_field/
animal_fighting_the_final_round/cockfighting_fact_sheet
Article:
Louisiana to be last state to ban cockfighting
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/
nation/la-na-cockfight28jun28,1,5067323.story?coll=la-headlines-nation
By Russell McCulley
NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - Louisiana will become the last U.S. state to outlaw cockfighting under a bill approved by the state legislature on Wednesday.
The ban, which will take effect in August 2008, follows a measure in New Mexico that outlawed cockfighting earlier this year.
Animal anti-cruelty groups in Louisiana have long sought a ban on the bloody sport, in which trained roosters battle, often to death.
But proponents of cockfighting managed to forestall a ban for years, defending the practice as an integral part of rural Louisiana culture.
Animal advocates hailed the vote as a triumph for Louisiana, much of which is still reeling from the devastation of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005.
"The whole country has been focused on Louisiana due to our massive rebuilding and recovery efforts, and no one wanted to see Louisiana blemished with the stigma of being the only state that still allowed such a brutal and inhumane practice," Laura Maloney, executive director of the Louisiana Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, said in a written statement.
Much of the debate over the bill in this year's legislative session centered on whether to ban cockfighting immediately, which animal rights groups favored, or to allow a one-year delay to give those in the business time to sell their animals and equipment.
The impasse nearly scuttled the ban, which has widespread public support in Louisiana. Lawmakers agreed to the one-year reprieve by a vote of 91-1 in the state House and unanimously in the Senate.
Legislators also approved a ban on gambling at cockfights that will take effect this summer, a move that could effectively end the sport much sooner than the 2008.
Gov. Kathleen Blanco is expected to sign both bills in coming days.
For more on why cockfighting is wrong, see -
http://www.hsus.org/hsus_field/
animal_fighting_the_final_round/cockfighting_fact_sheet
Article:
Louisiana to be last state to ban cockfighting
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/
nation/la-na-cockfight28jun28,1,5067323.story?coll=la-headlines-nation
By Russell McCulley
NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - Louisiana will become the last U.S. state to outlaw cockfighting under a bill approved by the state legislature on Wednesday.
The ban, which will take effect in August 2008, follows a measure in New Mexico that outlawed cockfighting earlier this year.
Animal anti-cruelty groups in Louisiana have long sought a ban on the bloody sport, in which trained roosters battle, often to death.
But proponents of cockfighting managed to forestall a ban for years, defending the practice as an integral part of rural Louisiana culture.
Animal advocates hailed the vote as a triumph for Louisiana, much of which is still reeling from the devastation of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005.
"The whole country has been focused on Louisiana due to our massive rebuilding and recovery efforts, and no one wanted to see Louisiana blemished with the stigma of being the only state that still allowed such a brutal and inhumane practice," Laura Maloney, executive director of the Louisiana Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, said in a written statement.
Much of the debate over the bill in this year's legislative session centered on whether to ban cockfighting immediately, which animal rights groups favored, or to allow a one-year delay to give those in the business time to sell their animals and equipment.
The impasse nearly scuttled the ban, which has widespread public support in Louisiana. Lawmakers agreed to the one-year reprieve by a vote of 91-1 in the state House and unanimously in the Senate.
Legislators also approved a ban on gambling at cockfights that will take effect this summer, a move that could effectively end the sport much sooner than the 2008.
Gov. Kathleen Blanco is expected to sign both bills in coming days.
10 Tips to Help Protect Pets on the Forth of July
As you might expect, the forth of July can be hell for cats and dogs. The tips below provide a few steps that can be taken to help alleviate the situation.
Article:
The Fourth is no fun for many pets
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07179/797658-62.stm
Thursday, June 28, 2007
By Linda Wilson Fuoco, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
The hiss, pop and crackle of July 4 fireworks can be terrifying or even deadly for dogs and other pets.
Online only
For more news you can use about pets, read Pet Tales Journal
Animals can be hurt by sparklers, cherry bombs and other kinds of fireworks set off in residential neighborhoods.
A lot of people don't realize that every year dogs and cats, terrified by fireworks, escape from their houses and yards. Many are never found, and some run out into roads and are killed by cars.
Warnings have been sent out by many animal organizations. The best of the batch this year comes from Purdue University's School of Veterinary Medicine.
"Owners need to use common sense when letting their pet join in the festivities," said Lorriane Corriveau, wellness veterinarian at the school in West Lafayette, Ind.
"Some dogs love to chase those spinning and swirling objects on the ground. Others are traumatized by loud noises. Owners can help with tricks that can be as simple as putting cotton in their pet's ears to muffle the sound."
Here are 10 tips from Dr. Corriveau:
Never leave pets alone outdoors, even if tethered or fenced. Dogs, especially, may escape and become lost. They may injure themselves by chewing or choking on their leashes. Keep small pets indoors and horses in their stalls.
Make sure all sharp objects are removed from enclosures.
Turn on the radio or TV for distraction.
Do not take pets to fireworks displays.
Do not leave a pet unattended in a car.
If a pet must be outside during July 4 festivities, make sure it is leashed or in a carrier.
Protect animals from children who may not realize that waving sparklers near a pet could upset the animal.
Keep ID tags current so the pet can be reunited with owners if loud noises cause it to run away.
Owners of dogs, cats or horses that have a history of being frightened during thunderstorms or fireworks should ask their veterinarian about administering sedatives or tranquilizers before the noise starts. Noise phobias can get worse with age.
Pick up leftover sparklers and other sharp objects when the festivities are over.
Tips come from many sources, including Going Home Greyhounds, the local group that finds homes for retired racing dogs.
Put a T-shirt that has been worn by a family member on your dog or in the dog's bed when you know the dog might be facing a stressful situation. This simple solution sometimes works wonders because the scent of the people they love can be very soothing for dogs.
So what's the deal with cats and with some of the people who own cats?
I'm talking about the endless flood of cats and kittens that are taken to animal shelters and animal rescues. I'm talking about the cats that are dumped in wooded areas and in some neighborhoods.
Article:
The Fourth is no fun for many pets
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07179/797658-62.stm
Thursday, June 28, 2007
By Linda Wilson Fuoco, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
The hiss, pop and crackle of July 4 fireworks can be terrifying or even deadly for dogs and other pets.
Online only
For more news you can use about pets, read Pet Tales Journal
Animals can be hurt by sparklers, cherry bombs and other kinds of fireworks set off in residential neighborhoods.
A lot of people don't realize that every year dogs and cats, terrified by fireworks, escape from their houses and yards. Many are never found, and some run out into roads and are killed by cars.
Warnings have been sent out by many animal organizations. The best of the batch this year comes from Purdue University's School of Veterinary Medicine.
"Owners need to use common sense when letting their pet join in the festivities," said Lorriane Corriveau, wellness veterinarian at the school in West Lafayette, Ind.
"Some dogs love to chase those spinning and swirling objects on the ground. Others are traumatized by loud noises. Owners can help with tricks that can be as simple as putting cotton in their pet's ears to muffle the sound."
Here are 10 tips from Dr. Corriveau:
Never leave pets alone outdoors, even if tethered or fenced. Dogs, especially, may escape and become lost. They may injure themselves by chewing or choking on their leashes. Keep small pets indoors and horses in their stalls.
Make sure all sharp objects are removed from enclosures.
Turn on the radio or TV for distraction.
Do not take pets to fireworks displays.
Do not leave a pet unattended in a car.
If a pet must be outside during July 4 festivities, make sure it is leashed or in a carrier.
Protect animals from children who may not realize that waving sparklers near a pet could upset the animal.
Keep ID tags current so the pet can be reunited with owners if loud noises cause it to run away.
Owners of dogs, cats or horses that have a history of being frightened during thunderstorms or fireworks should ask their veterinarian about administering sedatives or tranquilizers before the noise starts. Noise phobias can get worse with age.
Pick up leftover sparklers and other sharp objects when the festivities are over.
Tips come from many sources, including Going Home Greyhounds, the local group that finds homes for retired racing dogs.
Put a T-shirt that has been worn by a family member on your dog or in the dog's bed when you know the dog might be facing a stressful situation. This simple solution sometimes works wonders because the scent of the people they love can be very soothing for dogs.
So what's the deal with cats and with some of the people who own cats?
I'm talking about the endless flood of cats and kittens that are taken to animal shelters and animal rescues. I'm talking about the cats that are dumped in wooded areas and in some neighborhoods.
Thursday, June 21, 2007
Sporadic Postings: I’m Sorry
I started a new job about 2 months ago and I’m still catching up. I apologize and I’m hoping to get back to my daily postings soon. Please bear with me. It's killing me that I've been behind. I'm hoping to get back to my daily assured postings.
Cruel Australia at it Again: Plans Kill of 3,200 Kangaroos
Wow, once again Australia proves that it defaults to killing over any perceived issue it must face. Interesting that it’s in regard to Defense Department property. Connection between mentality…..
Article:
Animal rights activists warn of protests against cull of 3,200 kangaroos in Australia
The Associated Press
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/20/
asia/AS-GEN-Australia-Kangaroo-Cull.php
CANBERRA, Australia: Animal rights activists warned of protests after authorities Wednesday approved the cull of 3,200 kangaroos on the national capital's grassy fringes, saying the animals have become too numerous and risk starvation.
Canberra's administration, the Australian Capital Territory government, announced it would allow the Defense Department to shoot 2,800 kangaroos at one of its properties and use tranquilizer darts to kill another 400 on a second property, where shooting bullets its regarded as too dangerous to the public.
Defense officials said in a statement Wednesday that they would reveal on Thursday if they intend to go ahead with the cull.
The department argues that the 6,500 common eastern gray kangaroos that have overrun the properties at suburban Belconnen and Majura will starve if their numbers are not drastically reduced.
The defense officials and government agree that the kangaroos are also destroying the grassland habitats of endangered species of lizards and an insect.
Today in Asia - Pacific
Japan's universities fighting to attract students
Manchester City accepts bid from Thaksin
U.S. negotiator on surprise visit to North Korea
"We must care for the kangaroos as well as the threatened species of plants and animals, but our priority is to protect the rare and declining species," government official Russell Watkinson said in a statement announcing that the cull had been approved.
Pat O'Brien, president of Wildlife Protection Association of Australia, which has as its patrons the family of the late "Crocodile Hunter" Steve Irwin, threatened to trespass at the Belconnen site if the Defense Department attempts to dart kangaroos there and then administer lethal injections.
"I'll be the first one over the fence," O'Brien told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio.
Animal Liberation's Canberra spokesman Bernard Brennan predicted others would follow O'Brien in attempting to shield the kangaroos.
"If people feel that strongly, you can't stop them," Brennan said.
A government environmental adviser, Ian Fraser, said darting kangaroos was a last resort because the stress of capture can kill them.
"It's a very undesirable thing to do," Fraser said. "Shooting is much better, but that might not be an option at Belconnen."
Fraser said the most pressing problem was the environmental damage the kangaroos were doing to the grassland through overgrazing.
"This is native temperate grassland which is a critically endangered habitat," Fraser said, adding that there was no evidence yet that kangaroos were starving.
Article:
Animal rights activists warn of protests against cull of 3,200 kangaroos in Australia
The Associated Press
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/20/
asia/AS-GEN-Australia-Kangaroo-Cull.php
CANBERRA, Australia: Animal rights activists warned of protests after authorities Wednesday approved the cull of 3,200 kangaroos on the national capital's grassy fringes, saying the animals have become too numerous and risk starvation.
Canberra's administration, the Australian Capital Territory government, announced it would allow the Defense Department to shoot 2,800 kangaroos at one of its properties and use tranquilizer darts to kill another 400 on a second property, where shooting bullets its regarded as too dangerous to the public.
Defense officials said in a statement Wednesday that they would reveal on Thursday if they intend to go ahead with the cull.
The department argues that the 6,500 common eastern gray kangaroos that have overrun the properties at suburban Belconnen and Majura will starve if their numbers are not drastically reduced.
The defense officials and government agree that the kangaroos are also destroying the grassland habitats of endangered species of lizards and an insect.
Today in Asia - Pacific
Japan's universities fighting to attract students
Manchester City accepts bid from Thaksin
U.S. negotiator on surprise visit to North Korea
"We must care for the kangaroos as well as the threatened species of plants and animals, but our priority is to protect the rare and declining species," government official Russell Watkinson said in a statement announcing that the cull had been approved.
Pat O'Brien, president of Wildlife Protection Association of Australia, which has as its patrons the family of the late "Crocodile Hunter" Steve Irwin, threatened to trespass at the Belconnen site if the Defense Department attempts to dart kangaroos there and then administer lethal injections.
"I'll be the first one over the fence," O'Brien told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio.
Animal Liberation's Canberra spokesman Bernard Brennan predicted others would follow O'Brien in attempting to shield the kangaroos.
"If people feel that strongly, you can't stop them," Brennan said.
A government environmental adviser, Ian Fraser, said darting kangaroos was a last resort because the stress of capture can kill them.
"It's a very undesirable thing to do," Fraser said. "Shooting is much better, but that might not be an option at Belconnen."
Fraser said the most pressing problem was the environmental damage the kangaroos were doing to the grassland through overgrazing.
"This is native temperate grassland which is a critically endangered habitat," Fraser said, adding that there was no evidence yet that kangaroos were starving.
Editorial: Foie Gras Industry Ignores the Key Research
Normally I do not print editorials, but this one does contain many true facts.
For those who don’t know, foie gras is essentially the liver from a dead duck who was force-fed via a tube overly large quantities of foods in order to increase the liver beyond its usual size. As you might imagine it’s an extremely painful process. So, essentially, it’s hell on earth for them, and then they’re slaughtered. Quite a life.
More information on foie gras can be found at:
http://www.nofoiegras.org/
Article:
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/pa/8085072.html
Foie gras industry ignores the key research
The June 13 commentary, "Examine the facts in debate over foie gras," from the industry's public relations group, Artisan Farmers Alliance, could hardly have been more misleading.
If Nicolas Maduros, its executive director, truly wanted to "examine the facts," he would acknowledge that the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare, an independent council providing expert scientific analysis to the European Commission, found that the liver condition of force-fed birds is pathologic and force-feeding is "detrimental to the welfare of the birds."
The "only recommendation that the Committee can properly make is that force-feeding of ducks and geese should stop and that this could best be achieved by the prohibition of the production, importation, distribution and sale of foie gras," as committee member Dr. Dennis J. Alexander concluded.
The foie gras industry wants consumers to believe that force-feeding birds until their livers become diseased and engorged far beyond their normal, healthy size is "humane." Citizens and governments of 15 countries, state of California, and city of Chicago, who have all legislated against foie gras, disagree. Force-feeding ducks and geese through a pipe thrust down their throats merely for the sake of a so-called "delicacy" is clearly unnecessary and clearly inhumane.
Miyun Park
Vice President, Farm Animal Welfare
The Humane Society of the United States
Washington
mpark@humanesociety.org
For those who don’t know, foie gras is essentially the liver from a dead duck who was force-fed via a tube overly large quantities of foods in order to increase the liver beyond its usual size. As you might imagine it’s an extremely painful process. So, essentially, it’s hell on earth for them, and then they’re slaughtered. Quite a life.
More information on foie gras can be found at:
http://www.nofoiegras.org/
Article:
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/pa/8085072.html
Foie gras industry ignores the key research
The June 13 commentary, "Examine the facts in debate over foie gras," from the industry's public relations group, Artisan Farmers Alliance, could hardly have been more misleading.
If Nicolas Maduros, its executive director, truly wanted to "examine the facts," he would acknowledge that the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare, an independent council providing expert scientific analysis to the European Commission, found that the liver condition of force-fed birds is pathologic and force-feeding is "detrimental to the welfare of the birds."
The "only recommendation that the Committee can properly make is that force-feeding of ducks and geese should stop and that this could best be achieved by the prohibition of the production, importation, distribution and sale of foie gras," as committee member Dr. Dennis J. Alexander concluded.
The foie gras industry wants consumers to believe that force-feeding birds until their livers become diseased and engorged far beyond their normal, healthy size is "humane." Citizens and governments of 15 countries, state of California, and city of Chicago, who have all legislated against foie gras, disagree. Force-feeding ducks and geese through a pipe thrust down their throats merely for the sake of a so-called "delicacy" is clearly unnecessary and clearly inhumane.
Miyun Park
Vice President, Farm Animal Welfare
The Humane Society of the United States
Washington
mpark@humanesociety.org
Sunday, June 17, 2007
Dalai Lama Reiterates Support for Animal Rights and Vegetarianism
What sticks out here is that in the past he had eaten meat (which he admits) but yet still says that vegetarianism is the way. Very good quotes as well in term of how the human animal should view the non-human animals.
As he states below:
“Hunting, beef, sheep farms, piggeries, millions, billions, die,” the Dalai Lama said. “We can be so cruel to animals.”
“Taking care of animals is essential to developing more happiness in human beings,” he said. “I appreciate Steve Irwin and his wife, Terri, all their dedication.”
Article:
Dalai Lama makes case for animal rights
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2007/jun/14/dalai_lama_makes_case
_animal_rights/
By Dennis Passa - Associated Press Writer
June 14, 2007
Advertisement
The Dalai Lama, right, meets the Irwin family, from left, Terri, Bob and Bindi, with a koala, at Australia Zoo in Beerwah. The Dalai Lama spoke on animal rights at the zoo built by “Crocodile Hunter” Steve Irwin.
Steve Holland/AP Photo
The Dalai Lama, right, meets the Irwin family, from left, Terri, Bob and Bindi, with a koala, at Australia Zoo in Beerwah. The Dalai Lama spoke on animal rights at the zoo built by “Crocodile Hunter” Steve Irwin.
Beerwah, Australia — With creatures great and small around him, the Dalai Lama called Wednesday for a halt to lab experiments on animals and made the case for eating only fruits and vegetables — all at the zoo of the late “Crocodile Hunter” Steve Irwin.
The spiritual head of Tibetan Buddhists delicately handled a Burmese python and petted a koala as he was feted like a rock star at Australia Zoo, speaking to a sold-out crowd of 5,000 at its open-air “Crocoseum.”
“Hunting, beef, sheep farms, piggeries, millions, billions, die,” the Dalai Lama said. “We can be so cruel to animals.”
Although he sometimes sparked laughter with his remarks, the Dalai Lama’s 30-minute address also had a more serious note: He criticized companies and organizations that he said “remain indifferent” to the rights of animals by experimenting on them.
Irwin, host of the TV wildlife show “Crocodile Hunter,” died last September when the barb from a stingray pierced his chest while he was diving on the Great Barrier Reef.
The Dalai Lama thanked Irwin’s family for their support of wildlife.
“Taking care of animals is essential to developing more happiness in human beings,” he said. “I appreciate Steve Irwin and his wife, Terri, all their dedication.”
The hourlong zoo tour was a change for the Dalai Lama, whose trip to Australia has prompted lawmakers to express concern about meetings with the man China considers an exiled troublemaker.
After weeks of hedging, Prime Minister John Howard agreed to see the Dalai Lama on Friday. Howard is anxious not to offend Beijing because Australia’s economy is closely tied to China’s booming demand for natural resources. China, which rules Tibet, has used diplomatic pressure to discourage governments from meeting with the Dalai Lama, and Beijing immediately criticized Howard’s decision to see him.
The Dalai Lama, his long red robe flapping in the wind, received a standing ovation as he took the stage at the Crocoseum on a sunny but crisp winter morning.
Some of the crowd waved Buddhist prayer flags, and about a dozen Australian native birds, including black cockatoos and rainbow lorikeets, unexpectedly flew into the stadium just as he began speaking.
The Dalai Lama described the benefits of being a vegetarian, saying he became meat, dairy and egg-free in 1965, although he acknowledges he now eats meat occasionally. He said he used to buy animals to save them from the slaughterhouses when he was a young man in Tibet.
Asked to speak about the importance of family, the Dalai Lama urged parents to show as much compassion as possible to their children, and suggested that children be taught “warmheartedness” as part of the school curriculum.
The 71-year-old admitted he’s not sure how he’d cope as a parent.
“I’m a monk, so I have no children ... but I may lose my temper,” he said with a laugh.
The Dalai Lama’s visit ended when Terri Irwin and her children, Bindi and Bob, came on stage, with Bindi carrying a koala.
“He is rather lazy ... just like myself,” the Dalai Lama joked of the koala before presenting the Irwin family with Buddhist white scarves, or katas, which are used to signal the positive start of new relationships.
As he states below:
“Hunting, beef, sheep farms, piggeries, millions, billions, die,” the Dalai Lama said. “We can be so cruel to animals.”
“Taking care of animals is essential to developing more happiness in human beings,” he said. “I appreciate Steve Irwin and his wife, Terri, all their dedication.”
Article:
Dalai Lama makes case for animal rights
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2007/jun/14/dalai_lama_makes_case
_animal_rights/
By Dennis Passa - Associated Press Writer
June 14, 2007
Advertisement
The Dalai Lama, right, meets the Irwin family, from left, Terri, Bob and Bindi, with a koala, at Australia Zoo in Beerwah. The Dalai Lama spoke on animal rights at the zoo built by “Crocodile Hunter” Steve Irwin.
Steve Holland/AP Photo
The Dalai Lama, right, meets the Irwin family, from left, Terri, Bob and Bindi, with a koala, at Australia Zoo in Beerwah. The Dalai Lama spoke on animal rights at the zoo built by “Crocodile Hunter” Steve Irwin.
Beerwah, Australia — With creatures great and small around him, the Dalai Lama called Wednesday for a halt to lab experiments on animals and made the case for eating only fruits and vegetables — all at the zoo of the late “Crocodile Hunter” Steve Irwin.
The spiritual head of Tibetan Buddhists delicately handled a Burmese python and petted a koala as he was feted like a rock star at Australia Zoo, speaking to a sold-out crowd of 5,000 at its open-air “Crocoseum.”
“Hunting, beef, sheep farms, piggeries, millions, billions, die,” the Dalai Lama said. “We can be so cruel to animals.”
Although he sometimes sparked laughter with his remarks, the Dalai Lama’s 30-minute address also had a more serious note: He criticized companies and organizations that he said “remain indifferent” to the rights of animals by experimenting on them.
Irwin, host of the TV wildlife show “Crocodile Hunter,” died last September when the barb from a stingray pierced his chest while he was diving on the Great Barrier Reef.
The Dalai Lama thanked Irwin’s family for their support of wildlife.
“Taking care of animals is essential to developing more happiness in human beings,” he said. “I appreciate Steve Irwin and his wife, Terri, all their dedication.”
The hourlong zoo tour was a change for the Dalai Lama, whose trip to Australia has prompted lawmakers to express concern about meetings with the man China considers an exiled troublemaker.
After weeks of hedging, Prime Minister John Howard agreed to see the Dalai Lama on Friday. Howard is anxious not to offend Beijing because Australia’s economy is closely tied to China’s booming demand for natural resources. China, which rules Tibet, has used diplomatic pressure to discourage governments from meeting with the Dalai Lama, and Beijing immediately criticized Howard’s decision to see him.
The Dalai Lama, his long red robe flapping in the wind, received a standing ovation as he took the stage at the Crocoseum on a sunny but crisp winter morning.
Some of the crowd waved Buddhist prayer flags, and about a dozen Australian native birds, including black cockatoos and rainbow lorikeets, unexpectedly flew into the stadium just as he began speaking.
The Dalai Lama described the benefits of being a vegetarian, saying he became meat, dairy and egg-free in 1965, although he acknowledges he now eats meat occasionally. He said he used to buy animals to save them from the slaughterhouses when he was a young man in Tibet.
Asked to speak about the importance of family, the Dalai Lama urged parents to show as much compassion as possible to their children, and suggested that children be taught “warmheartedness” as part of the school curriculum.
The 71-year-old admitted he’s not sure how he’d cope as a parent.
“I’m a monk, so I have no children ... but I may lose my temper,” he said with a laugh.
The Dalai Lama’s visit ended when Terri Irwin and her children, Bindi and Bob, came on stage, with Bindi carrying a koala.
“He is rather lazy ... just like myself,” the Dalai Lama joked of the koala before presenting the Irwin family with Buddhist white scarves, or katas, which are used to signal the positive start of new relationships.
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Joshua Winston, Veterinarian in Phoenix, Arizona, Faces Cruelty Charges After He Hit a Five-Pound Chihuahua in the Head So Hard That He Dislodged Eye
I post this as a reminder to limit your trust.
Article:
Vet Arrested in Chihuahua's Beating
http://www.fox11az.com/news/topstories/stories/
kmsb-20070612-apjc-fetarrested.3e323f51.html
The Associated Press
PHOENIX - Arizona authorities arrested a veterinarian Monday on suspicion that he hit a five-pound Chihuahua in the head so hard that he dislodged the dog's eye. Joshua Winston faces animal cruelty charges in the June 4 incident, according to Maricopa County Sheriff's Office spokesman Capt. Paul Chagolla.
Another spokesman, Deputy Charles Scudella, said Winston had posted bond Monday night and would be released. He did not know how much the bond was.
Employees at the Sun City West Animal Hospital northwest of Phoenix reported that Winston hit the Chihuahua, named Bella, in the head three to five times with his fist.
The dog survived, but had to undergo corrective surgery.
"The eye was put back in and stitched," Scudella said. "It's a wait-and-see if the dog still gets use of the eye."
Two veterinarian technicians who said they witnessed the incident told the sheriff's office that Winston was extremely frustrated with the dog because it was uncooperative and aggressive during a visit for spay surgery.
"We trust our vets with those that we love most," Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said. "Most vets are good people, they love animals. I just hope this is an isolated incident, not just with this vet, but with any vet."
Winston also faces a theft charge from an incident earlier this year. Hospital employees said Winston charged a client $80 for medication he didn't give a Neapolitan Mastiff after the dog became uncooperative.
A call to the animal hospital was not immediately returned Monday.
,,,
On the Net:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office: http://www.mcso.org/
Article:
Vet Arrested in Chihuahua's Beating
http://www.fox11az.com/news/topstories/stories/
kmsb-20070612-apjc-fetarrested.3e323f51.html
The Associated Press
PHOENIX - Arizona authorities arrested a veterinarian Monday on suspicion that he hit a five-pound Chihuahua in the head so hard that he dislodged the dog's eye. Joshua Winston faces animal cruelty charges in the June 4 incident, according to Maricopa County Sheriff's Office spokesman Capt. Paul Chagolla.
Another spokesman, Deputy Charles Scudella, said Winston had posted bond Monday night and would be released. He did not know how much the bond was.
Employees at the Sun City West Animal Hospital northwest of Phoenix reported that Winston hit the Chihuahua, named Bella, in the head three to five times with his fist.
The dog survived, but had to undergo corrective surgery.
"The eye was put back in and stitched," Scudella said. "It's a wait-and-see if the dog still gets use of the eye."
Two veterinarian technicians who said they witnessed the incident told the sheriff's office that Winston was extremely frustrated with the dog because it was uncooperative and aggressive during a visit for spay surgery.
"We trust our vets with those that we love most," Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said. "Most vets are good people, they love animals. I just hope this is an isolated incident, not just with this vet, but with any vet."
Winston also faces a theft charge from an incident earlier this year. Hospital employees said Winston charged a client $80 for medication he didn't give a Neapolitan Mastiff after the dog became uncooperative.
A call to the animal hospital was not immediately returned Monday.
,,,
On the Net:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office: http://www.mcso.org/
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Inherent Cruelty of Puppy Mills / Dog Breeders Begin to be Exposed
For more on the truth behind dog breeders, puppy mills and pet stores see http://geari.blogspot.com/search?q=puppy+mills
Article:
States attempt crackdowns on puppy mills
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070603/ap_on_re_us/puppy_mills_1
By ERIC OLSON, Associated Press Writer Sun Jun 3, 1:41 PM ET
OMAHA, Neb. - Bob Baker has seen the worst of the worst in his 27 years as an animal cruelty investigator.
There was the Missouri breeder who would skimp on food by skinning dead dogs and feeding them to other dogs in his kennel. There was the South Dakota breeder who used a handsaw to amputate the leg of a pregnant Rottweiler, injured in an attack by another dog, in hopes that the Rottweiler would survive long enough to give birth to another litter.
Baker says such cases are the exception, but adds that mistreatment of dogs in large-scale breeding operations remains common and troubling.
"Most breeders learn how to keep their standards just above violating cruelty statutes, but the conditions are still unacceptable," said Baker, a St. Louis-based national investigator for the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. "It's difficult dealing with these people. We file charges on the most egregious ones."
State legislators across the nation are attempting to crack down on rogue breeding operations and pet sellers.
The week after the May 16 rescue of 173 dogs from the property of a Dawson County man, the Nebraska Legislature passed a law that increased the number of state kennel inspectors from one to four and requires new operations to be inspected before opening.
Puppy lemon laws, which let buyers get their money back if health or genetic defects are discovered within a set time, are on the books in 16 states and were introduced in four others this year.
California lawmakers are studying a bill that would require cats and dogs over 4 months old to be spayed or neutered, unless the person caring for them obtains a breeding license.
Laws that would tighten the regulation of retail pet shops are pending in Oregon, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, and bills establishing standards for breeding operations were introduced in Minnesota and Ohio.
Mass breeding has been a hot-button issue for decades with animal welfare activists, who use the term "puppy mills" to describe the most unsavory of operations, which are usually situated in rural areas.
The Humane Society of the United States has long identified Missouri, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Ohio and Pennsylvania as the major puppy-mill states, said outreach director Stephanie Shain.
Of the 7 million to 9 million dogs brought into U.S. families each year, Shain said, an estimated 2 million to 4 million are products of puppy mills.
The demand for popular breeds, and the high prices people are willing to pay, keep breeding operations churning, Shain said. A quick Internet search showed many puppies with four-figure sale prices, and some breeds, including bulldogs and Belgian Malinois, with top prices exceeding $3,000.
Many dog breeders chafe at the term "puppy mill," saying it is inflammatory and lumps conscientious commercial dog breeders together with the unscrupulous.
Clem Disterhaupt, president of the Nebraska Dog Breeders Association, said most commercial breeders have the animals' best interest at heart.
"We don't associate ourselves with puppy mills, but sometimes people are under the impression that if you have a lot of dogs, you must be a puppy mill," Disterhaupt said.
Disterhaupt said reputable breeders are licensed with state or federal agencies and provide adequate space, cleanliness, heat and air conditioning and ventilation.
"That's not a puppy mill," he said. "People need to distinguish the difference."
Daisy Okas, assistant vice president of communications for the American Kennel Club, said breeders, kennel operators and pet stores register all types of breeds with her organization. The AKC has 15 inspectors who visit about 5,000 places a year where significant numbers of dogs are registered.
Shain, however, said people who want a puppy should avoid pet stores and instead buy from a hobby breeder or adopt from a shelter.
Puppy mills, Shain said, damage dogs emotionally and physically because the animals are confined in tight, unsanitary quarters with little or no socialization with humans or veterinary care. Females are bred repeatedly, some when they're as young as 6 months.
The overbreeding, combined with the dismal environment, results in sickly puppies that have genetic defects and temperament problems, she said. The dogs are sold in pet stores or on the Internet to unsuspecting buyers.
Investigators such as Baker inspect breeding operations after receiving complaints. Breeders usually cooperate, but when they don't, he said, he gathers information by interviewing neighbors and observing the facility from afar.
Baker, who said he has visited more than 750 breeding facilities since 1980, said that when he finds evidence of animal cruelty, he notifies local law enforcement.
"Most abuse we see is neglect," Baker said. "They know some of the stuff they're doing is wrong, and they're embarrassed. They apologize a lot of times when we come see them. But they're blinded by the greed and money they're making off of this.
"Some start out with the right intentions. They breed a few and make money, so they get more dogs but don't put money back in. They get swamped."
____
On the Net:
Humane Society of the United States: http://www.hsus.org
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: http://www.aspca.org
Article:
States attempt crackdowns on puppy mills
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070603/ap_on_re_us/puppy_mills_1
By ERIC OLSON, Associated Press Writer Sun Jun 3, 1:41 PM ET
OMAHA, Neb. - Bob Baker has seen the worst of the worst in his 27 years as an animal cruelty investigator.
There was the Missouri breeder who would skimp on food by skinning dead dogs and feeding them to other dogs in his kennel. There was the South Dakota breeder who used a handsaw to amputate the leg of a pregnant Rottweiler, injured in an attack by another dog, in hopes that the Rottweiler would survive long enough to give birth to another litter.
Baker says such cases are the exception, but adds that mistreatment of dogs in large-scale breeding operations remains common and troubling.
"Most breeders learn how to keep their standards just above violating cruelty statutes, but the conditions are still unacceptable," said Baker, a St. Louis-based national investigator for the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. "It's difficult dealing with these people. We file charges on the most egregious ones."
State legislators across the nation are attempting to crack down on rogue breeding operations and pet sellers.
The week after the May 16 rescue of 173 dogs from the property of a Dawson County man, the Nebraska Legislature passed a law that increased the number of state kennel inspectors from one to four and requires new operations to be inspected before opening.
Puppy lemon laws, which let buyers get their money back if health or genetic defects are discovered within a set time, are on the books in 16 states and were introduced in four others this year.
California lawmakers are studying a bill that would require cats and dogs over 4 months old to be spayed or neutered, unless the person caring for them obtains a breeding license.
Laws that would tighten the regulation of retail pet shops are pending in Oregon, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, and bills establishing standards for breeding operations were introduced in Minnesota and Ohio.
Mass breeding has been a hot-button issue for decades with animal welfare activists, who use the term "puppy mills" to describe the most unsavory of operations, which are usually situated in rural areas.
The Humane Society of the United States has long identified Missouri, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Ohio and Pennsylvania as the major puppy-mill states, said outreach director Stephanie Shain.
Of the 7 million to 9 million dogs brought into U.S. families each year, Shain said, an estimated 2 million to 4 million are products of puppy mills.
The demand for popular breeds, and the high prices people are willing to pay, keep breeding operations churning, Shain said. A quick Internet search showed many puppies with four-figure sale prices, and some breeds, including bulldogs and Belgian Malinois, with top prices exceeding $3,000.
Many dog breeders chafe at the term "puppy mill," saying it is inflammatory and lumps conscientious commercial dog breeders together with the unscrupulous.
Clem Disterhaupt, president of the Nebraska Dog Breeders Association, said most commercial breeders have the animals' best interest at heart.
"We don't associate ourselves with puppy mills, but sometimes people are under the impression that if you have a lot of dogs, you must be a puppy mill," Disterhaupt said.
Disterhaupt said reputable breeders are licensed with state or federal agencies and provide adequate space, cleanliness, heat and air conditioning and ventilation.
"That's not a puppy mill," he said. "People need to distinguish the difference."
Daisy Okas, assistant vice president of communications for the American Kennel Club, said breeders, kennel operators and pet stores register all types of breeds with her organization. The AKC has 15 inspectors who visit about 5,000 places a year where significant numbers of dogs are registered.
Shain, however, said people who want a puppy should avoid pet stores and instead buy from a hobby breeder or adopt from a shelter.
Puppy mills, Shain said, damage dogs emotionally and physically because the animals are confined in tight, unsanitary quarters with little or no socialization with humans or veterinary care. Females are bred repeatedly, some when they're as young as 6 months.
The overbreeding, combined with the dismal environment, results in sickly puppies that have genetic defects and temperament problems, she said. The dogs are sold in pet stores or on the Internet to unsuspecting buyers.
Investigators such as Baker inspect breeding operations after receiving complaints. Breeders usually cooperate, but when they don't, he said, he gathers information by interviewing neighbors and observing the facility from afar.
Baker, who said he has visited more than 750 breeding facilities since 1980, said that when he finds evidence of animal cruelty, he notifies local law enforcement.
"Most abuse we see is neglect," Baker said. "They know some of the stuff they're doing is wrong, and they're embarrassed. They apologize a lot of times when we come see them. But they're blinded by the greed and money they're making off of this.
"Some start out with the right intentions. They breed a few and make money, so they get more dogs but don't put money back in. They get swamped."
____
On the Net:
Humane Society of the United States: http://www.hsus.org
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: http://www.aspca.org
Dan Piraro, Cartoonist of Bizarro – Vegan and Environmentalist
Because he’s a relatively new vegan, he has a healthy look at the subject of animal rights. Here are a few quotes from the article below that sum up his look at the issues:
“There are so many people out there that just have no idea of the impact that their day-to-day lifestyle choices have, and that was me six years ago, so you know, I’m not being judgmental.”
“Environmental and animal rights issues are so interwoven, there’s no way to separate those two issues. Vegetarianism is environmentalism. It’s all the same issue.”
“There’s is an inordinate amount of suffering caused by a person’s 99-cent hamburger... [Most people have] no idea what tremendous amount of suffering and environmental damage is being done — and political damage with all the subsidies. It just drives you crazy once you know.”
Article:
Bizarro's Piraro
http://thesuburban.com/content.jsp?sid=
20476197201962316595503958513&ctid=1000073
&cnid=1011863
By Anthony Bonaparte, The Suburban
Syndicated cartoonist Dan Piraro was in town last month to speak at the Blue Metropolis Montreal International Literary Festival.
Anybody who reads the newspaper comics pages is familiar with Bizarro — the surrealistic panel ‘toon with a die-hard following of fans of all that is warped.
Dan Piraro, the 48-year-old cartoonist behind Bizarro, was in town last month to speak at the Blue Metropolis Montreal International Literary Festival and says he’s thrilled to have such a loyal fan base.
“Every time I get an e-mail from somebody who loves my work and has been enjoying it for years ... It’s like ‘wow,’ how terrific is that?”
Born in Kansas City, Missouri, Piraro debuted the cartoon in 1986 and though it now appears in more than 250 daily newspapers, Piraro says he’s not as rich as people might think.
“The one regret I have is that I haven’t made more money at it,” says Piraro, who now makes Brooklyn, New York, his home. “It’s hard to make money in syndication, but I make a living, so I’m very lucky.”
Known mainly as a cartoonist, the eclectic artist also expresses his creative freedom as a stand-up comic, painter and writer, with his latest book, Bizarro and Other Strange Manifestations of the Art of Dan Piraro, released just last year. His one-man Bizarro Baloney Comedy Show is an on-again-off-again labour of love.
“I haven’t actually done an organized tour of any kind since last year when I took my comedy show around and made my wife promise to never let me do that again,” says a laughing Piraro, who is not enamoured with lugging sets, props, costumes and multi-media equipment through airports.
All things being equal, Piraro says if he had to pick one interest over all the others, and still make a living, it would be his painting, “cause there’s no parameters, there’s no rules to it — and there’s no deadlines.”
Piraro says syndication deadlines are brutal, and were especially difficult to handle several years ago when he had to produce comics while going through the painful end of his 16-year marriage.
“It was horrible. It was the one time in my life where I really wished that I had just been an accountant. You know, something where I could just get dressed, go to work and add numbers all day. Something mindless that was simple,” he said.
”Now watch. If you print that, every accountant in Canada will be writing to me. I get a lot of hate mail.
“Trying to be creative and funny in the midst of emotional distress, when your brain won’t stop chewing on this one single issue, is just torture,” says Piraro.
Environmentalism and animal rights play a central role in his life, and the two issues are often reflected in his work. He became more ardent after meeting his second wife, Ashley Smith, a long-time animal-rights activist. Like Smith, Piraro turned to veganism when he learned more about how farm and agricultural animals are treated.
“There are so many people out there that just have no idea of the impact that their day-to-day lifestyle choices have, and that was me six years ago, so you know, I’m not being judgmental.”
Piraro often beats the animal rights drum in his cartoons, sometimes so subtly that some people might not notice — but it’s there.
“A lot of my cartoons are born out of anger. And a lot of it is just the anger of ignorance,” says Piraro.
“Environmental and animal rights issues are so interwoven, there’s no way to separate those two issues. Vegetarianism is environmentalism. It’s all the same issue.”
His anger is aimed at a media that he says doesn’t give the issue enough coverage, at politicians who turn a blind eye, and at the average citizen who doesn’t bother to get informed.
“There’s is an inordinate amount of suffering caused by a person’s 99-cent hamburger... [Most people have] no idea what tremendous amount of suffering and environmental damage is being done — and political damage with all the subsidies. It just drives you crazy once you know.”
Piraro hits the issue so persistently that he was honoured for his efforts in 2002 by the Humane Society.
Piraro also is bugged by what he sees as an American attitude toward religion that is becoming increasingly poisonous politically. But he says its a topic he’s not allowed to address in his newspaper cartoons.
“Newspaper editors are almost more skittish about religion than they are about sex. And they’re certainly more skittish about religion than they are about violence, which has always driven me crazy.”
He says he would like more freedom to do cartoons on contentious issues, but the need to be politically correct has gotten out of control. “It’s insane. I’m too embarrassed to be an American.”
The outspoken Piraro scoffs at the idea of receiving Dixie Chicks-like treatment for his statement.
The country singers’ albums and concerts were boycotted after member and Texas native Natalie Maines said the group was ashamed that the President of the United States was from Texas.
“The sort of people that follow me are embarrassed to be Americans,” says Piraro. “They’re not toothless rednecks like the Dixie Chicks followers, and I’m not that popular. It’s not like they can shut me down.”
Informed that The Suburban’s website has U.S. readers, Piraro laughed and said, “I’m sure you do, but they’re not right-wing nit-wits who would blow the whistle on me.”
“There are so many people out there that just have no idea of the impact that their day-to-day lifestyle choices have, and that was me six years ago, so you know, I’m not being judgmental.”
“Environmental and animal rights issues are so interwoven, there’s no way to separate those two issues. Vegetarianism is environmentalism. It’s all the same issue.”
“There’s is an inordinate amount of suffering caused by a person’s 99-cent hamburger... [Most people have] no idea what tremendous amount of suffering and environmental damage is being done — and political damage with all the subsidies. It just drives you crazy once you know.”
Article:
Bizarro's Piraro
http://thesuburban.com/content.jsp?sid=
20476197201962316595503958513&ctid=1000073
&cnid=1011863
By Anthony Bonaparte, The Suburban
Syndicated cartoonist Dan Piraro was in town last month to speak at the Blue Metropolis Montreal International Literary Festival.
Anybody who reads the newspaper comics pages is familiar with Bizarro — the surrealistic panel ‘toon with a die-hard following of fans of all that is warped.
Dan Piraro, the 48-year-old cartoonist behind Bizarro, was in town last month to speak at the Blue Metropolis Montreal International Literary Festival and says he’s thrilled to have such a loyal fan base.
“Every time I get an e-mail from somebody who loves my work and has been enjoying it for years ... It’s like ‘wow,’ how terrific is that?”
Born in Kansas City, Missouri, Piraro debuted the cartoon in 1986 and though it now appears in more than 250 daily newspapers, Piraro says he’s not as rich as people might think.
“The one regret I have is that I haven’t made more money at it,” says Piraro, who now makes Brooklyn, New York, his home. “It’s hard to make money in syndication, but I make a living, so I’m very lucky.”
Known mainly as a cartoonist, the eclectic artist also expresses his creative freedom as a stand-up comic, painter and writer, with his latest book, Bizarro and Other Strange Manifestations of the Art of Dan Piraro, released just last year. His one-man Bizarro Baloney Comedy Show is an on-again-off-again labour of love.
“I haven’t actually done an organized tour of any kind since last year when I took my comedy show around and made my wife promise to never let me do that again,” says a laughing Piraro, who is not enamoured with lugging sets, props, costumes and multi-media equipment through airports.
All things being equal, Piraro says if he had to pick one interest over all the others, and still make a living, it would be his painting, “cause there’s no parameters, there’s no rules to it — and there’s no deadlines.”
Piraro says syndication deadlines are brutal, and were especially difficult to handle several years ago when he had to produce comics while going through the painful end of his 16-year marriage.
“It was horrible. It was the one time in my life where I really wished that I had just been an accountant. You know, something where I could just get dressed, go to work and add numbers all day. Something mindless that was simple,” he said.
”Now watch. If you print that, every accountant in Canada will be writing to me. I get a lot of hate mail.
“Trying to be creative and funny in the midst of emotional distress, when your brain won’t stop chewing on this one single issue, is just torture,” says Piraro.
Environmentalism and animal rights play a central role in his life, and the two issues are often reflected in his work. He became more ardent after meeting his second wife, Ashley Smith, a long-time animal-rights activist. Like Smith, Piraro turned to veganism when he learned more about how farm and agricultural animals are treated.
“There are so many people out there that just have no idea of the impact that their day-to-day lifestyle choices have, and that was me six years ago, so you know, I’m not being judgmental.”
Piraro often beats the animal rights drum in his cartoons, sometimes so subtly that some people might not notice — but it’s there.
“A lot of my cartoons are born out of anger. And a lot of it is just the anger of ignorance,” says Piraro.
“Environmental and animal rights issues are so interwoven, there’s no way to separate those two issues. Vegetarianism is environmentalism. It’s all the same issue.”
His anger is aimed at a media that he says doesn’t give the issue enough coverage, at politicians who turn a blind eye, and at the average citizen who doesn’t bother to get informed.
“There’s is an inordinate amount of suffering caused by a person’s 99-cent hamburger... [Most people have] no idea what tremendous amount of suffering and environmental damage is being done — and political damage with all the subsidies. It just drives you crazy once you know.”
Piraro hits the issue so persistently that he was honoured for his efforts in 2002 by the Humane Society.
Piraro also is bugged by what he sees as an American attitude toward religion that is becoming increasingly poisonous politically. But he says its a topic he’s not allowed to address in his newspaper cartoons.
“Newspaper editors are almost more skittish about religion than they are about sex. And they’re certainly more skittish about religion than they are about violence, which has always driven me crazy.”
He says he would like more freedom to do cartoons on contentious issues, but the need to be politically correct has gotten out of control. “It’s insane. I’m too embarrassed to be an American.”
The outspoken Piraro scoffs at the idea of receiving Dixie Chicks-like treatment for his statement.
The country singers’ albums and concerts were boycotted after member and Texas native Natalie Maines said the group was ashamed that the President of the United States was from Texas.
“The sort of people that follow me are embarrassed to be Americans,” says Piraro. “They’re not toothless rednecks like the Dixie Chicks followers, and I’m not that popular. It’s not like they can shut me down.”
Informed that The Suburban’s website has U.S. readers, Piraro laughed and said, “I’m sure you do, but they’re not right-wing nit-wits who would blow the whistle on me.”
Thursday, May 31, 2007
Egomaniac David Beckham's And Los Angeles Galaxy Push To Legalise The Importation And Sale Of Kangaroo Skins In California
I guess vanity and too much money just isn’t enough for glam boy Beckham and his new glam team the Los Angeles Galaxy.
Article:
Beckham in push for roo skin boots
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/
0,22606,21829059-910,00.html
PETA HELLARD, LOS ANGELES
June 01, 2007 02:15am
DAVID Beckham's new U.S. soccer team is behind a bid to legalise the importation and sale of kangaroo skins in California - so soccer players can wear boots made from the marsupials' leather.
After years of lobbying by sportswear giant adidas, the California Senate voted this week to end California's 37-year import ban on kangaroo products.
The Senate kangaroo Bill has pitted the Los Angeles Galaxy and CD Chivas USA soccer teams against animal rights activists.
The Bill passed in the Senate - after four years of failed efforts - would allow a kangaroo product to be imported and sold in California if the species were not otherwise protected by laws in the U.S. and abroad.
The Bill must still be approved by the Assembly and signed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to come into force.
Of the 55 species of kangaroos in Australia, six are commercially harvested and exported, including red kangaroos and eastern and western gray kangaroos.
Animal activists are fighting the proposal, which they say will lead to the deaths of endangered roos because hunting is done at night so it is hard to identify the exact species.
Lauren Ornelas, spokeswoman for animal rights organisation Viva USA, said Adidas had been relentless in spending about $530,000 to promote the Bill.
"Kangaroos are wildlife, not shoes," she said.
"Adidas needs to get in step with the times and use synthetic materials."
LA Galaxy president Alexi Lalas said California's law deprived his team.
"It is unfair to have these products freely available for commercial purchase in all of the other 49 states and not here," he said.
Article:
Beckham in push for roo skin boots
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/
0,22606,21829059-910,00.html
PETA HELLARD, LOS ANGELES
June 01, 2007 02:15am
DAVID Beckham's new U.S. soccer team is behind a bid to legalise the importation and sale of kangaroo skins in California - so soccer players can wear boots made from the marsupials' leather.
After years of lobbying by sportswear giant adidas, the California Senate voted this week to end California's 37-year import ban on kangaroo products.
The Senate kangaroo Bill has pitted the Los Angeles Galaxy and CD Chivas USA soccer teams against animal rights activists.
The Bill passed in the Senate - after four years of failed efforts - would allow a kangaroo product to be imported and sold in California if the species were not otherwise protected by laws in the U.S. and abroad.
The Bill must still be approved by the Assembly and signed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to come into force.
Of the 55 species of kangaroos in Australia, six are commercially harvested and exported, including red kangaroos and eastern and western gray kangaroos.
Animal activists are fighting the proposal, which they say will lead to the deaths of endangered roos because hunting is done at night so it is hard to identify the exact species.
Lauren Ornelas, spokeswoman for animal rights organisation Viva USA, said Adidas had been relentless in spending about $530,000 to promote the Bill.
"Kangaroos are wildlife, not shoes," she said.
"Adidas needs to get in step with the times and use synthetic materials."
LA Galaxy president Alexi Lalas said California's law deprived his team.
"It is unfair to have these products freely available for commercial purchase in all of the other 49 states and not here," he said.
“…[Meat] Generates More Greenhouse Gases than All the Cars, Trucks, And [Planes] In the World Combined,” Group Calls For Tax Breaks for Vegetarians
Citing the Fact That “…Raising Animals for Food Generates More Greenhouse Gases than All the Cars, Trucks, And [Planes] In the World Combined,” Group Calls For Tax Breaks for Vegetarians
It only makes sense. It’s pure logic.
Article:
PETA seeks tax breaks for vegetarians
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/peta-seeks-tax-
breaks-for-vegetarians-2007-05-31.html
By Ilan Wurman
May 31, 2007
Citing the need to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals is calling on congressional leaders to give vegetarians a tax break.
In a letter sent Wednesday to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), PETA President Ingrid Newkirk stated, “[V]egetarians are responsible for far fewer greenhouse-gas emissions and other kinds of environmental degradation than meat-eaters.”
The letter added that vegetarians should receive a tax break “just as people who purchase a hybrid vehicle enjoy a tax break.”
Asked how the government would certify that taxpayers are vegetarian, PETA spokesman Matt Prescott said, “I imagine that a system could be adopted whereby taxpayers could show receipts for food purchases and/or sign an affidavit attesting … that they are vegetarian. If Congress is seriously interested about rewarding people for reducing their carbon emissions, then it could develop a system to verify that people are vegetarian.”
Congressional leaders, however, have not shown any indication of pursuing such a tax break.
The PETA letter draws on research conducted at the University of Chicago and a U.N. report. According to the letter, anyone switching to a hybrid car will lessen the emissions of carbon dioxide by only one ton per year, while anyone forgoing their love of meat will spare the environment one and a half tons per year.
Citing the U.N. report, Newkirk wrote, “[S]cientists determined that raising animals for food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars, trucks, and [planes] in the world combined.”
“Although most Americans can’t afford to pay upward of $20,000 for a new hybrid car,” the letter continues, “everyone can go vegetarian.”
Newkirk added, “Anyone who buys a hybrid in order to cut down on their contribution to global warming and uses it to drive to the supermarket to buy chicken, steaks, and milk should face up to the fact that there’s no such thing as a meat-eating environmentalist.”
It only makes sense. It’s pure logic.
Article:
PETA seeks tax breaks for vegetarians
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/peta-seeks-tax-
breaks-for-vegetarians-2007-05-31.html
By Ilan Wurman
May 31, 2007
Citing the need to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals is calling on congressional leaders to give vegetarians a tax break.
In a letter sent Wednesday to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), PETA President Ingrid Newkirk stated, “[V]egetarians are responsible for far fewer greenhouse-gas emissions and other kinds of environmental degradation than meat-eaters.”
The letter added that vegetarians should receive a tax break “just as people who purchase a hybrid vehicle enjoy a tax break.”
Asked how the government would certify that taxpayers are vegetarian, PETA spokesman Matt Prescott said, “I imagine that a system could be adopted whereby taxpayers could show receipts for food purchases and/or sign an affidavit attesting … that they are vegetarian. If Congress is seriously interested about rewarding people for reducing their carbon emissions, then it could develop a system to verify that people are vegetarian.”
Congressional leaders, however, have not shown any indication of pursuing such a tax break.
The PETA letter draws on research conducted at the University of Chicago and a U.N. report. According to the letter, anyone switching to a hybrid car will lessen the emissions of carbon dioxide by only one ton per year, while anyone forgoing their love of meat will spare the environment one and a half tons per year.
Citing the U.N. report, Newkirk wrote, “[S]cientists determined that raising animals for food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars, trucks, and [planes] in the world combined.”
“Although most Americans can’t afford to pay upward of $20,000 for a new hybrid car,” the letter continues, “everyone can go vegetarian.”
Newkirk added, “Anyone who buys a hybrid in order to cut down on their contribution to global warming and uses it to drive to the supermarket to buy chicken, steaks, and milk should face up to the fact that there’s no such thing as a meat-eating environmentalist.”
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
Air Canada Continues Trans-Atlantic Shipments of Dogs to Europe to Be Tortured In Animal Experimentation
What’s shocking here is the callousness by Air Canada, but also the stress that passengers witnessed and then displayed when learning where these dogs were going. Sad too is that they were wagging their tails, unknowingly heading to torture.
“Passengers on the flight found the sound of the dogs very distressing.
"All we could hear during the boarding and before the takeoff was barking, crying and whimpering," said one passenger in business class on Flight 870 who did not want to be identified.”
Article:
Beagles flown to labs for testing
Air Canada confirms shipments to Europe
http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/
story.html?id=0010ae9f-d017-444f-8bb8-3b69dedf7528
MAX HARROLD, The Gazette
Published: Tuesday, May 29, 2007
Speeding down the runway in Dorval May 21, Air Canada passengers bound for Paris heard a lot more than just the jet's engines wailing.
Dogs were yelping in the cargo hold beneath them.
The estimated 70 to 100 healthy beagles were among many regular - and perfectly legal - trans-Atlantic shipments by Air Canada of dogs destined for medical experiments.
Passengers on the flight found the sound of the dogs very distressing.
"All we could hear during the boarding and before the takeoff was barking, crying and whimpering," said one passenger in business class on Flight 870 who did not want to be identified.
After landing in Paris, passengers saw three pallets with cages of two dogs each being unloaded from the Airbus 330 aircraft.
"Their tails were wagging through the cages," said one passenger, who also asked not to be identified.
"We were shocked to hear some flight attendants say this goes on regularly - dogs get shipped to Paris for experiments." Because Quebec's animalprotection law is vague and weakly enforced, the province provides a steady source of dogs for laboratories both here and abroad, animal rights activists said.
"Fifty per cent of all dogs used for medical research in Canada are used in Quebec," said Liz White, a director of the Animal Alliance of Canada, a national animal rights group.
Figures found on the website the Canadian Council on Animal Care, a government-funded organization that monitors animal research, show 5,610 dogs were "used" in Quebec in 2005.
That same year, 5,127 dogs were used in all the other provinces combined.
Despite a tough new provincial animal-welfare law enacted 2004, "Quebec is a frontier province for animal abusers," White said.
"There are very few bylaws, there is a high euthanasia rate by pet owners), and the claim rate for lost pets is very low." The Quebec atmosphere helps medical researchers trade in animals, she said.
Only four inspectors enforce Quebec's animal-welfare law, which allows for fines of $200 to $15,000 for repeat offenders. In Ontario, more than 200 inspectors enforce animal-welfare regulations.
Suzanne Lecomte, chief inspector with Anima-Quebec, a not-for-profit agency that applies the new law, said the "law is vague. It says simply you cannot compromise the safety and welfare of the animal." Linda Robertson, director of the Monteregie SPCA, said beagles are often used in research because they are particularly docile.
"You can do with a beagle whatever you want," she said.
"It's not going to bite you." The breed can be tailor-made to develop certain cancers, she added.
Pierre Barnoti, executive director of the SPCA in Montreal, said his group has been aware of the air shipments for years.
"Our investigators have checked out the dogs' health and they're fine," Barnoti said.
"These are not puppy mill dogs," he said.
Claude Morin, president of Air Canada Cargo, confirmed the existence of animal shipments for medical research.
"It's completely legal," Morin said. "The animals are treated perfectly (en route).We don't really ask too many questions about where they're going.
Clients don't have to tell us anything." Air Canada spokesperson Isabelle Arthur said a 1998 ruling by the Canadian Transportation Agency forbids the airline from refusing to ship animals simply because of their purpose. The ruling was made after Air Canada refused to carry monkeys intended for vivisection.
But Jadrino Huot, a spokesperson for the CTA, said the ruling was made to force Air Canada to apply its own policies and that the airline was entirely within its rights to change its policies.
"Air travel is a deregulated industry," he said. "They set their own policies." One Air Canada flight attendant, who asked not to be identi- fied, said the dog shipments have been kept "hush, hush." "It's a business," she said.
"They shouldn't be doing this."
“Passengers on the flight found the sound of the dogs very distressing.
"All we could hear during the boarding and before the takeoff was barking, crying and whimpering," said one passenger in business class on Flight 870 who did not want to be identified.”
Article:
Beagles flown to labs for testing
Air Canada confirms shipments to Europe
http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/
story.html?id=0010ae9f-d017-444f-8bb8-3b69dedf7528
MAX HARROLD, The Gazette
Published: Tuesday, May 29, 2007
Speeding down the runway in Dorval May 21, Air Canada passengers bound for Paris heard a lot more than just the jet's engines wailing.
Dogs were yelping in the cargo hold beneath them.
The estimated 70 to 100 healthy beagles were among many regular - and perfectly legal - trans-Atlantic shipments by Air Canada of dogs destined for medical experiments.
Passengers on the flight found the sound of the dogs very distressing.
"All we could hear during the boarding and before the takeoff was barking, crying and whimpering," said one passenger in business class on Flight 870 who did not want to be identified.
After landing in Paris, passengers saw three pallets with cages of two dogs each being unloaded from the Airbus 330 aircraft.
"Their tails were wagging through the cages," said one passenger, who also asked not to be identified.
"We were shocked to hear some flight attendants say this goes on regularly - dogs get shipped to Paris for experiments." Because Quebec's animalprotection law is vague and weakly enforced, the province provides a steady source of dogs for laboratories both here and abroad, animal rights activists said.
"Fifty per cent of all dogs used for medical research in Canada are used in Quebec," said Liz White, a director of the Animal Alliance of Canada, a national animal rights group.
Figures found on the website the Canadian Council on Animal Care, a government-funded organization that monitors animal research, show 5,610 dogs were "used" in Quebec in 2005.
That same year, 5,127 dogs were used in all the other provinces combined.
Despite a tough new provincial animal-welfare law enacted 2004, "Quebec is a frontier province for animal abusers," White said.
"There are very few bylaws, there is a high euthanasia rate by pet owners), and the claim rate for lost pets is very low." The Quebec atmosphere helps medical researchers trade in animals, she said.
Only four inspectors enforce Quebec's animal-welfare law, which allows for fines of $200 to $15,000 for repeat offenders. In Ontario, more than 200 inspectors enforce animal-welfare regulations.
Suzanne Lecomte, chief inspector with Anima-Quebec, a not-for-profit agency that applies the new law, said the "law is vague. It says simply you cannot compromise the safety and welfare of the animal." Linda Robertson, director of the Monteregie SPCA, said beagles are often used in research because they are particularly docile.
"You can do with a beagle whatever you want," she said.
"It's not going to bite you." The breed can be tailor-made to develop certain cancers, she added.
Pierre Barnoti, executive director of the SPCA in Montreal, said his group has been aware of the air shipments for years.
"Our investigators have checked out the dogs' health and they're fine," Barnoti said.
"These are not puppy mill dogs," he said.
Claude Morin, president of Air Canada Cargo, confirmed the existence of animal shipments for medical research.
"It's completely legal," Morin said. "The animals are treated perfectly (en route).We don't really ask too many questions about where they're going.
Clients don't have to tell us anything." Air Canada spokesperson Isabelle Arthur said a 1998 ruling by the Canadian Transportation Agency forbids the airline from refusing to ship animals simply because of their purpose. The ruling was made after Air Canada refused to carry monkeys intended for vivisection.
But Jadrino Huot, a spokesperson for the CTA, said the ruling was made to force Air Canada to apply its own policies and that the airline was entirely within its rights to change its policies.
"Air travel is a deregulated industry," he said. "They set their own policies." One Air Canada flight attendant, who asked not to be identi- fied, said the dog shipments have been kept "hush, hush." "It's a business," she said.
"They shouldn't be doing this."
Mice Hung by Their Tails with Tape, Subjected To Electrical Shocks And Forced To Swim Until Nearly Drowning at University of New Mexico
Need I say more?? Well, one thing – it’s obvious the ridiculous cruelty here, but to then see the school say this was to study depression is just insane. To me this is a study in torture. Let’s put it this way – if you did this in your home, you’d be arrested for animal torture and everyone who found about what you were doing would say you are crazy. Instead, because this was at a university, they somehow are able to rationalize it.
Article:
UNM criticized over use of mice in study
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/
20070521/ap_on_sc/animal_research_1
Mon May 21, 4:28 PM ET
ALBUQUERQUE - Mice were hung by their tails with adhesive tape, subjected to electrical shocks and forced to swim until nearly drowning during experiments done at the University of New Mexico.
ADVERTISEMENT
University officials say there was nothing wrong with the research that helped a high school student study hopelessness and depression for a science fair project. But the former lab veterinarian at the university called the research "torture," and an animal protection group said it was a perversion of science, the Albuquerque Journal reported in a story published Sunday.
"To me, it suggests inadequacy of faculty guidance," said Randall Lockwood, senior vice president of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. "This has been against the rules for science fairs for a quarter-century."
Then-La Cueva High School student Sarah Founds conducted the research in 2003 and 2004 for a science fair project, which was disqualified after national science-fair officials said it violated standards on the ethical use of animals. The research also led to the resignation of the lab's research veterinarian, who said he didn't know about the experiments until after the fact.
"I have defended animal research, stating that we do not abuse animals. Then, this slapped me in the face," said Daniel Theele, who had been in charge of the welfare of lab animals at UNM.
Theele complained about the project and now is suing UNM over the treatment he says he received after being forced to resign in October 2005. An internal investigation at UNM concluded that the experiments violated federal guidelines and had not been properly approved.
A report on the investigation also expressed great concern about exposing a high school student to experiments inflicting pain on animals.
Theele said the experiments were inappropriate even for medical students to conduct.
"I can provide no justification for a high school student being exposed to those kinds of experiments," he said.
However, UNM continues to defend what happened.
"No illegal, abusive or inappropriate conduct or research occurred," an attorney for the UNM board of regents, wrote in a response to Theele's lawsuit.
Terry Yates, vice president for research at UNM, and other university officials could not be reached for comment.
Founds, who did the research in conjunction with a graduate student in 2003 and a medical student in 2004, said the project at UNM was worthwhile and did no harm.
"I thought it was awesome. I had a lot of fun working on it," said Founds, who now is studying nutrition at the University of Idaho.
She said the project "wasn't overly painful."
"I'd encourage other students to do that kind of research," she said.
UNM has between 7,000 and 8,000 animals for use in teaching or research. Most of the animals are mice or rats, but there are other creatures such as hamsters, frogs, fish, rabbits and snakes, said Susan McKinsey, communications director for the university.
Elizabeth Jennings, executive director of Animal Protection of New Mexico, said the experiments on mice raise questions about "what the thousands of other animals on campus are being subjected to, and if anyone is paying attention."
Ray Powell, a veterinarian serving as the regional director of the Jane Goodall Institute, said greater openness about research "would set our university apart and be a beacon for the rest of the country."
"I would hope the state's premier research facility — the University of New Mexico — would see this as an opportunity to set a new standard for openness and humane treatment of animals," Powell said.
Article:
UNM criticized over use of mice in study
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/
20070521/ap_on_sc/animal_research_1
Mon May 21, 4:28 PM ET
ALBUQUERQUE - Mice were hung by their tails with adhesive tape, subjected to electrical shocks and forced to swim until nearly drowning during experiments done at the University of New Mexico.
ADVERTISEMENT
University officials say there was nothing wrong with the research that helped a high school student study hopelessness and depression for a science fair project. But the former lab veterinarian at the university called the research "torture," and an animal protection group said it was a perversion of science, the Albuquerque Journal reported in a story published Sunday.
"To me, it suggests inadequacy of faculty guidance," said Randall Lockwood, senior vice president of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. "This has been against the rules for science fairs for a quarter-century."
Then-La Cueva High School student Sarah Founds conducted the research in 2003 and 2004 for a science fair project, which was disqualified after national science-fair officials said it violated standards on the ethical use of animals. The research also led to the resignation of the lab's research veterinarian, who said he didn't know about the experiments until after the fact.
"I have defended animal research, stating that we do not abuse animals. Then, this slapped me in the face," said Daniel Theele, who had been in charge of the welfare of lab animals at UNM.
Theele complained about the project and now is suing UNM over the treatment he says he received after being forced to resign in October 2005. An internal investigation at UNM concluded that the experiments violated federal guidelines and had not been properly approved.
A report on the investigation also expressed great concern about exposing a high school student to experiments inflicting pain on animals.
Theele said the experiments were inappropriate even for medical students to conduct.
"I can provide no justification for a high school student being exposed to those kinds of experiments," he said.
However, UNM continues to defend what happened.
"No illegal, abusive or inappropriate conduct or research occurred," an attorney for the UNM board of regents, wrote in a response to Theele's lawsuit.
Terry Yates, vice president for research at UNM, and other university officials could not be reached for comment.
Founds, who did the research in conjunction with a graduate student in 2003 and a medical student in 2004, said the project at UNM was worthwhile and did no harm.
"I thought it was awesome. I had a lot of fun working on it," said Founds, who now is studying nutrition at the University of Idaho.
She said the project "wasn't overly painful."
"I'd encourage other students to do that kind of research," she said.
UNM has between 7,000 and 8,000 animals for use in teaching or research. Most of the animals are mice or rats, but there are other creatures such as hamsters, frogs, fish, rabbits and snakes, said Susan McKinsey, communications director for the university.
Elizabeth Jennings, executive director of Animal Protection of New Mexico, said the experiments on mice raise questions about "what the thousands of other animals on campus are being subjected to, and if anyone is paying attention."
Ray Powell, a veterinarian serving as the regional director of the Jane Goodall Institute, said greater openness about research "would set our university apart and be a beacon for the rest of the country."
"I would hope the state's premier research facility — the University of New Mexico — would see this as an opportunity to set a new standard for openness and humane treatment of animals," Powell said.
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Cruel China at it Again: Zoos in China Described as "Insane Asylums for Animals" and a National Disgrace: Live Domestic Animals Fed To Lions
Cruel china is back again. This time it’s exposing the horrors of zoos in the country. Turns out that they love to see live animals mauled and torn apart for sheer enjoyment. Very cruel country indeed but very much China.
Article:
China's Zoos: 'Asylums for Animals'
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-1266775,00.html
By Peter Sharp,
China Correspondent
Updated: 17:57, Tuesday May 22, 2007
China's zoos have been described as "insane asylums for animals" and a national disgrace, where live domestic pets are fed to lions and tigers for the entertainment of visitors.
Animals are trained to perform tricks
Animals are trained to perform tricks
Animal rights activists have told Sky News that in 10 years of monitoring animals' living conditions there has been "no improvement".
Campaigner Dr John Wederburn said: "I come back to the same zoo four or five years later and the same animals are still trapped in the same tiny cage.
"It's called zoo-chosis. The animals are simply driven out of their minds by the boredom."
Stage shows, in which bears are trained to twirl sticks of fire and ride motorcycles, came in for particular criticism.
At one zoo, a three-year-old bear was put in a dress and a harness to pull a car twice a day in front of the holiday crowds.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, a trip round the Harbin Wildlife Park in Northern China ends with a gruesome spectacle.
The world's biggest breeding centre for Siberian tigers encourages visitors to buy domestic animals that will be fed live to the tigers.
Special vending flaps are fitted on the tourist buses to allow visitors to feed chickens to the waiting tigers.
A live chicken can be purchased for £2.60, while a cow costs £100.
The authorities at the park say the tigers are being trained to be released back into the wild and argue that the fees charged for the live animals are used to support the park.
But Dr Wederburn has described the practice as "medieval", while the World Society for the Protection of Animals also condemned it.
Virginia McKenna, of the wildlife charity Born Free, said: "With the Olympic Games just a year away, China has a short window of opportunity to tackle these issues.
"(It) faces the very real possibility that many of the millions of sports enthusiasts will return not with memories of the Olympic spectacle, nor of China's undoubted ancient civilisation and culture... but of the animal welfare horrors that still go on, causing such suffering, and offending us all."
Article:
China's Zoos: 'Asylums for Animals'
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-1266775,00.html
By Peter Sharp,
China Correspondent
Updated: 17:57, Tuesday May 22, 2007
China's zoos have been described as "insane asylums for animals" and a national disgrace, where live domestic pets are fed to lions and tigers for the entertainment of visitors.
Animals are trained to perform tricks
Animals are trained to perform tricks
Animal rights activists have told Sky News that in 10 years of monitoring animals' living conditions there has been "no improvement".
Campaigner Dr John Wederburn said: "I come back to the same zoo four or five years later and the same animals are still trapped in the same tiny cage.
"It's called zoo-chosis. The animals are simply driven out of their minds by the boredom."
Stage shows, in which bears are trained to twirl sticks of fire and ride motorcycles, came in for particular criticism.
At one zoo, a three-year-old bear was put in a dress and a harness to pull a car twice a day in front of the holiday crowds.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, a trip round the Harbin Wildlife Park in Northern China ends with a gruesome spectacle.
The world's biggest breeding centre for Siberian tigers encourages visitors to buy domestic animals that will be fed live to the tigers.
Special vending flaps are fitted on the tourist buses to allow visitors to feed chickens to the waiting tigers.
A live chicken can be purchased for £2.60, while a cow costs £100.
The authorities at the park say the tigers are being trained to be released back into the wild and argue that the fees charged for the live animals are used to support the park.
But Dr Wederburn has described the practice as "medieval", while the World Society for the Protection of Animals also condemned it.
Virginia McKenna, of the wildlife charity Born Free, said: "With the Olympic Games just a year away, China has a short window of opportunity to tackle these issues.
"(It) faces the very real possibility that many of the millions of sports enthusiasts will return not with memories of the Olympic spectacle, nor of China's undoubted ancient civilisation and culture... but of the animal welfare horrors that still go on, causing such suffering, and offending us all."
Clinton Portis of the Washington Redskins Loves Dog Fighting: Supports Dog Fighting Supporter and Atlanta Falcon Dog Fighter Michael Vick
Article:
Redskins apologize for Portis' remarks
http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=119&sid=1147818
The Associated Press
Article Launched: 05/22/2007 05:56:43 PM PDT
ASHBURN, Va.- The Washington Redskins apologized Tuesday for comments running back Clinton Portis made during a television interview ridiculing authorities for pursuing possible dog fighting charges against Michael Vick.
Also, tackle Chris Samuels said he was wrong for joking about dog fighting during the interview he and Portis did Monday with WAVY-TV in Norfolk.
In the segment, Portis said that Vick would be put "behind bars for no reason" if the Atlanta Falcons quarterback were charged and convicted for dog fighting. Samuels laughed during much of the interview.
"The Washington Redskins, as an organization, obviously would never condone anything related to animal cruelty," the team's statement said. "The team takes the recent comments of Clinton Portis very seriously and apologizes to everyone that was offended."
It was the second statement in two days from the Redskins over the dog fighting flap. Late Monday, the team released a statement on behalf of Portis in which the running back said: "I want to make it clear I do not take part in dog fighting or condone dog fighting in any manner."
Portis and Samuels giggled and laughed frequently during the interview as they defended Vick, who has been under investigation since a police raid at one of his houses discovered dozens of dogs and items associated with dog fighting. No charges have been filed.
"I don't know if he was fighting dogs or not," Portis said in the interview. "But
Advertisement
it's his property; it's his dogs. If that's what he wants to do, do it."
Portis, a native of Laurel, Miss., added: "I know a lot of back roads that got a dog fight if you want to go see it. But they're not bothering those people because those people are not big names. I'm sure there's some police got some dogs that are fighting them, some judges got dogs and everything else."
When Portis suggested that Vick would be "cheated" if charged and convicted, Samuels giggled and said: "Haven't you seen Animal Planet?"
On Tuesday, Samuels apologized for his behavior.
"We were wrong for joking about the situation," Samuels said. "It's very serious. We don't agree with dog fighting."
Redskins apologize for Portis' remarks
http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=119&sid=1147818
The Associated Press
Article Launched: 05/22/2007 05:56:43 PM PDT
ASHBURN, Va.- The Washington Redskins apologized Tuesday for comments running back Clinton Portis made during a television interview ridiculing authorities for pursuing possible dog fighting charges against Michael Vick.
Also, tackle Chris Samuels said he was wrong for joking about dog fighting during the interview he and Portis did Monday with WAVY-TV in Norfolk.
In the segment, Portis said that Vick would be put "behind bars for no reason" if the Atlanta Falcons quarterback were charged and convicted for dog fighting. Samuels laughed during much of the interview.
"The Washington Redskins, as an organization, obviously would never condone anything related to animal cruelty," the team's statement said. "The team takes the recent comments of Clinton Portis very seriously and apologizes to everyone that was offended."
It was the second statement in two days from the Redskins over the dog fighting flap. Late Monday, the team released a statement on behalf of Portis in which the running back said: "I want to make it clear I do not take part in dog fighting or condone dog fighting in any manner."
Portis and Samuels giggled and laughed frequently during the interview as they defended Vick, who has been under investigation since a police raid at one of his houses discovered dozens of dogs and items associated with dog fighting. No charges have been filed.
"I don't know if he was fighting dogs or not," Portis said in the interview. "But
Advertisement
it's his property; it's his dogs. If that's what he wants to do, do it."
Portis, a native of Laurel, Miss., added: "I know a lot of back roads that got a dog fight if you want to go see it. But they're not bothering those people because those people are not big names. I'm sure there's some police got some dogs that are fighting them, some judges got dogs and everything else."
When Portis suggested that Vick would be "cheated" if charged and convicted, Samuels giggled and said: "Haven't you seen Animal Planet?"
On Tuesday, Samuels apologized for his behavior.
"We were wrong for joking about the situation," Samuels said. "It's very serious. We don't agree with dog fighting."
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
eBay Leads to Elephant Extinction: Supports and Sells Ivory over Online Auction Site
Disgusting and disgraceful. How they can allow this is beyond reason. Seems the money too rules eBay.
Article:
Animal rights group condemns 'rampant' eBay ivory trade
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/112851/animal-rights-group-
condemns-rampant-ebay-ivory-trade.html
6:23AM, Tuesday 15th May 2007
The elephant, the world's largest land mammal, is being threatened with global extinction by a 'rampant trade' in ivory on the eBay online auction site, animal welfare campaigners said on Tuesday.
The International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) said it had conducted a survey in the UK, Australia, China, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Canada and the US and tracked more than 2,200 elephant ivory items listed on eBay websites.
It found more than 90 per cent of the listings breached even eBay's own wildlife policies.
International wildlife trade laws differ from country to country and are often complex, but according to the IFAW in general it is illegal to sell carved or uncarved ivory unless it is antique and accompanied by a proof of age certificate.
The Fund says the only way to protect elephants from poachers is to shut down
the markets where illegal ivory can easily be passed off as antique.
'As the world's largest online shop window, eBay has a special responsibility to lead the way by banning ivory from their sites,' said Robbie Marsland, IFAW's British director.
'Only a global ban on all ivory sales will remove the cover under which this criminal activity currently operates and as a result, seriously help to decrease illegal trade and the cruel and unnecessary slaughter of elephants.'
Gareth Streeter, a spokesman for eBay in London, said in a statement the website operated policies to 'restrict the sale of ivory in accordance with existing UK and international law.
'We have had a number of positive and fruitful discussions with the IFAW about how we can work together to ensure that our policies are effectively enforced, and we are committed to working with them to tackle the problem of illegal ivory sales,' he said.
Marsland urged eBay to ban all trade in ivory.
'Elephants are facing extinction, in part because of Internet ivory trade. It is time for action,' he said.
Article:
Animal rights group condemns 'rampant' eBay ivory trade
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/112851/animal-rights-group-
condemns-rampant-ebay-ivory-trade.html
6:23AM, Tuesday 15th May 2007
The elephant, the world's largest land mammal, is being threatened with global extinction by a 'rampant trade' in ivory on the eBay online auction site, animal welfare campaigners said on Tuesday.
The International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) said it had conducted a survey in the UK, Australia, China, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Canada and the US and tracked more than 2,200 elephant ivory items listed on eBay websites.
It found more than 90 per cent of the listings breached even eBay's own wildlife policies.
International wildlife trade laws differ from country to country and are often complex, but according to the IFAW in general it is illegal to sell carved or uncarved ivory unless it is antique and accompanied by a proof of age certificate.
The Fund says the only way to protect elephants from poachers is to shut down
the markets where illegal ivory can easily be passed off as antique.
'As the world's largest online shop window, eBay has a special responsibility to lead the way by banning ivory from their sites,' said Robbie Marsland, IFAW's British director.
'Only a global ban on all ivory sales will remove the cover under which this criminal activity currently operates and as a result, seriously help to decrease illegal trade and the cruel and unnecessary slaughter of elephants.'
Gareth Streeter, a spokesman for eBay in London, said in a statement the website operated policies to 'restrict the sale of ivory in accordance with existing UK and international law.
'We have had a number of positive and fruitful discussions with the IFAW about how we can work together to ensure that our policies are effectively enforced, and we are committed to working with them to tackle the problem of illegal ivory sales,' he said.
Marsland urged eBay to ban all trade in ivory.
'Elephants are facing extinction, in part because of Internet ivory trade. It is time for action,' he said.
Masterfoods Turns Back on Vegans: Adds Animal Products to Mars, Twix and Snickers: No Regard for Vegetarian Customers
I’m not sure why they even need to add a product like rennet or whey. It comes down to just simply not caring about vegans and their issues.
Article:
Mars starts using animal products
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6653175.stm?ls
Mars, Snickers and Twix chocolate bars
Masterfoods' brands are household names
Some of the UK's best-selling chocolate bars, such as Mars and Twix, will no longer be suitable for vegetarians.
Also affecting brands such as Snickers and Maltesers, owner Masterfoods said it had started to use animal product rennet to make its chocolate products.
Masterfoods said the change was due to it switching the sourcing of its ingredients and the admission was a "principled decision" on its part.
The Vegetarian Society said the company's move was "incomprehensible".
'Extremely disappointed'
Masterfoods said it had started using rennet from 1 May and non-affected products had a "best before date" up to 1 October.
Masterfoods' decision to use non-vegetarian whey is a backward step
Vegetarian Society
Rennet, a chemical sourced from calves' stomachs, is used in the production of whey.
It will now also be found in Bounty, Minstrels and Milky Way products, and the ice cream versions of all Masterfoods' bars.
"If the customer is an extremely strict vegetarian, then we are sorry the products are no longer suitable, but a less strict vegetarian should enjoy our chocolate," said Paul Goalby, corporate affairs manager for Masterfoods.
The Vegetarian Society said it was "extremely disappointed".
"At a time when more and more consumers are concerned about the provenance of their food, Masterfoods' decision to use non-vegetarian whey is a backward step," it said in a statement.
"Mars products are very popular with young people and many will be shocked to discover that their manufacture now relies on the extraction of rennet from the stomach lining of young calves," it added.
Article:
Mars starts using animal products
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6653175.stm?ls
Mars, Snickers and Twix chocolate bars
Masterfoods' brands are household names
Some of the UK's best-selling chocolate bars, such as Mars and Twix, will no longer be suitable for vegetarians.
Also affecting brands such as Snickers and Maltesers, owner Masterfoods said it had started to use animal product rennet to make its chocolate products.
Masterfoods said the change was due to it switching the sourcing of its ingredients and the admission was a "principled decision" on its part.
The Vegetarian Society said the company's move was "incomprehensible".
'Extremely disappointed'
Masterfoods said it had started using rennet from 1 May and non-affected products had a "best before date" up to 1 October.
Masterfoods' decision to use non-vegetarian whey is a backward step
Vegetarian Society
Rennet, a chemical sourced from calves' stomachs, is used in the production of whey.
It will now also be found in Bounty, Minstrels and Milky Way products, and the ice cream versions of all Masterfoods' bars.
"If the customer is an extremely strict vegetarian, then we are sorry the products are no longer suitable, but a less strict vegetarian should enjoy our chocolate," said Paul Goalby, corporate affairs manager for Masterfoods.
The Vegetarian Society said it was "extremely disappointed".
"At a time when more and more consumers are concerned about the provenance of their food, Masterfoods' decision to use non-vegetarian whey is a backward step," it said in a statement.
"Mars products are very popular with young people and many will be shocked to discover that their manufacture now relies on the extraction of rennet from the stomach lining of young calves," it added.
Atlanta Falcons Quarterback Michael Vick Is Involved In Dog Fighting: Trouble Continues For Troubled and Cruel Quarterback and NFL
So now it’s dog fighting. I guess Vick isn’t happy with his millions. He really needs to feed his cruel side as well.
Article:
Dog Fighting Is Cruel, and Vick Has Questions to Answer
http://www.aolsportsblog.com/2007/05/15/dog-
fighting-is-cruel-and-vick-has-questions-to-answer/
Posted May 15th 2007 9:41AM by Michael David Smith
Filed under: Falcons, NFL Gossip, NFL Rumors, Atlanta, NFL Police Blotter
The evidence is mounting that Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick is involved in dog fighting. The extent to which he's involved isn't quite clear, but at this point he would have to be willfully ignorant if he didn't have at least some inclination that the property he owned was being used to raise dogs that were used for fighting. It's time for Vick to stop dodging questions and start answering them.
We'll have much more to say about this as details unfold, but I have a feeling that a lot of people don't really know what dog fighting is. The Humane Society's dog fighting fact sheet is a good place to start. I was surprised to learn there that a dog fight typically lasts an hour -- I was envisioning something that lasts a few seconds or a few minutes. Roger Goodell is probably more concerned about the fact that illegal gambling is a major part of the dog fighting culture than he is about cruelty to animals. If Vick is involved with gamblers, he's going to face a very long suspension.
But the animal cruelty aspect is the one that's going to do more damage to Vick's reputation. Animal advocacy groups aren't going to let this issue go, and every company that has an endorsement deal with Vick is going to be hearing about it. I think this is going to cost him millions.
The picture shows a dog fight in Afghanistan last year.
Article:
Dog Fighting Is Cruel, and Vick Has Questions to Answer
http://www.aolsportsblog.com/2007/05/15/dog-
fighting-is-cruel-and-vick-has-questions-to-answer/
Posted May 15th 2007 9:41AM by Michael David Smith
Filed under: Falcons, NFL Gossip, NFL Rumors, Atlanta, NFL Police Blotter
The evidence is mounting that Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick is involved in dog fighting. The extent to which he's involved isn't quite clear, but at this point he would have to be willfully ignorant if he didn't have at least some inclination that the property he owned was being used to raise dogs that were used for fighting. It's time for Vick to stop dodging questions and start answering them.
We'll have much more to say about this as details unfold, but I have a feeling that a lot of people don't really know what dog fighting is. The Humane Society's dog fighting fact sheet is a good place to start. I was surprised to learn there that a dog fight typically lasts an hour -- I was envisioning something that lasts a few seconds or a few minutes. Roger Goodell is probably more concerned about the fact that illegal gambling is a major part of the dog fighting culture than he is about cruelty to animals. If Vick is involved with gamblers, he's going to face a very long suspension.
But the animal cruelty aspect is the one that's going to do more damage to Vick's reputation. Animal advocacy groups aren't going to let this issue go, and every company that has an endorsement deal with Vick is going to be hearing about it. I think this is going to cost him millions.
The picture shows a dog fight in Afghanistan last year.
Saturday, May 05, 2007
House Committee in Louisiana Recommends Making Cockfighting Illegal in 2008
Well, a little late, but better then than never. We’ll see.
Article:
La. House panel OKs ban on cockfighting in 2008
http://www.leesvilledailyleader.com/articles/2007/
05/04/news/news6.txt
By DOUG SIMPSON | Associated Press
May 3, 2007
BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) _ Louisiana, the last state where cockfighting is legal, should ban the practice _ but not until 2008, a state House committee has decided.
New Mexico banned cockfighting earlier this year, increasing pressure on Louisiana lawmakers to do the same after years of resistance. Members of the House Agriculture Committee tried and failed to agree on a bill last year, but on Thursday unanimously approved a compromise measure to criminalize staged rooster fights beginning in December 2008.
"We shouldn't be the last state," said Rep. Harold Ritchie, D-Bogalusa, a sponsor. "We should have beat New Mexico last year."
The panel's main point of dispute was whether to ban cockfighting this year or give people involved in the industry time to sell their roosters and find new careers. Rep. Jack Smith argued it would be unfair to immediately impose a ban and make cockfighters criminals.
"I want to be humane not only to the chickens, but to the people who own the chickens," said Smith, D-Franklin.
EnvironmentalDefense.org
Animal rights advocates opposed delaying the ban, arguing that cockfighting is animal abuse that should be criminalized immediately.
Michael Markarian, an executive vice president with the Humane Society of the United States, said people who raise the roosters and stage the fights have had warning that cockfighting is on its last legs.
"There has been plenty of advanced notice," he said.
Cockfighting enthusiasts said they need more time. Richard Apshire, owner of a cockfighting arena in Calcasieu Parish, said he has 50 employees who will need to find new jobs.
Animal rights groups also said penalties for those convicted of staging cockfights should be tougher. The measure makes cockfighting a misdemeanor with penalties of up to six months in prison and $1,000 in fines.
Cockfighting is a felony in 33 states, according to the U.S. Humane Society, which argued for tougher penalties in Louisiana.
The measure, by Ritchie and Rep. Mike Strain, R-Covington, goes to the full House for debate. House Speaker Joe Salter, D-Florien, and Gov. Kathleen Blanco have said they'll support some form of cockfighting ban.
A competing bill that would ban cockfighting this year is awaiting debate in a Senate committee. That measure, by Sen. Art Lentini, has the support of animal rights groups.
Article:
La. House panel OKs ban on cockfighting in 2008
http://www.leesvilledailyleader.com/articles/2007/
05/04/news/news6.txt
By DOUG SIMPSON | Associated Press
May 3, 2007
BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) _ Louisiana, the last state where cockfighting is legal, should ban the practice _ but not until 2008, a state House committee has decided.
New Mexico banned cockfighting earlier this year, increasing pressure on Louisiana lawmakers to do the same after years of resistance. Members of the House Agriculture Committee tried and failed to agree on a bill last year, but on Thursday unanimously approved a compromise measure to criminalize staged rooster fights beginning in December 2008.
"We shouldn't be the last state," said Rep. Harold Ritchie, D-Bogalusa, a sponsor. "We should have beat New Mexico last year."
The panel's main point of dispute was whether to ban cockfighting this year or give people involved in the industry time to sell their roosters and find new careers. Rep. Jack Smith argued it would be unfair to immediately impose a ban and make cockfighters criminals.
"I want to be humane not only to the chickens, but to the people who own the chickens," said Smith, D-Franklin.
EnvironmentalDefense.org
Animal rights advocates opposed delaying the ban, arguing that cockfighting is animal abuse that should be criminalized immediately.
Michael Markarian, an executive vice president with the Humane Society of the United States, said people who raise the roosters and stage the fights have had warning that cockfighting is on its last legs.
"There has been plenty of advanced notice," he said.
Cockfighting enthusiasts said they need more time. Richard Apshire, owner of a cockfighting arena in Calcasieu Parish, said he has 50 employees who will need to find new jobs.
Animal rights groups also said penalties for those convicted of staging cockfights should be tougher. The measure makes cockfighting a misdemeanor with penalties of up to six months in prison and $1,000 in fines.
Cockfighting is a felony in 33 states, according to the U.S. Humane Society, which argued for tougher penalties in Louisiana.
The measure, by Ritchie and Rep. Mike Strain, R-Covington, goes to the full House for debate. House Speaker Joe Salter, D-Florien, and Gov. Kathleen Blanco have said they'll support some form of cockfighting ban.
A competing bill that would ban cockfighting this year is awaiting debate in a Senate committee. That measure, by Sen. Art Lentini, has the support of animal rights groups.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Search for More Content
Custom Search
